
Acumatica vs NetSuite: two cloud ERPs, very different philosophies
Acumatica and NetSuite are both cloud ERP platforms targeting mid-market companies, but they approach the market from opposite directions. NetSuite is Oracle-backed, cloud-only, and charges per user. Acumatica is privately held (now backed by EQT), offers hybrid deployment, and charges based on resources consumed rather than user count. That pricing difference alone drives most of the initial interest in the comparison.
TL;DR: Acumatica wins on pricing flexibility (no per-user fees), manufacturing depth, and deployment options including on-premises. NetSuite wins on financial sophistication, ecosystem size, eCommerce capabilities, and scalability to $500M+. For a 50-user company, expect $50,000-90,000/year for Acumatica vs. $80,000-120,000/year for NetSuite in license costs.
Both are capable platforms. The right choice depends on your business model, team size, deployment preferences, and which operational areas matter most to you.
Pricing models: the headline difference
NetSuite charges per user. Base platform runs roughly $999/month, plus $99-199/month per named user depending on role. A 30-person company can expect $50,000-80,000/year in license costs before modules (detailed pricing breakdown). The per-user model means costs scale linearly as you add people. For companies with large warehouse or shop floor teams that need system access, this adds up fast.
Acumatica charges by resource consumption. There's no per-user fee. You pay based on the tier of functionality, transaction volume, and storage. This means you can give system access to 50, 100, or 200 users without incremental license cost. For businesses with many light users — warehouse workers scanning barcodes, field techs logging time, shop floor operators entering production data — Acumatica's model can be significantly cheaper.
The flip side: Acumatica's pricing is less predictable. As your transaction volume grows, you may need to upgrade tiers. And the "unlimited users" pitch gets muddied when you factor in the actual tier costs. Don't take the "unlimited" claim at face value — get a detailed quote based on your actual transaction volumes.
Realistic comparison for a 50-user company: NetSuite might run $80,000-120,000/year in licenses. Acumatica might run $50,000-90,000/year for similar functionality. The gap narrows as you add NetSuite modules and Acumatica tiers. Implementation costs are comparable: $50,000-200,000 depending on complexity.
Deployment: cloud-only vs flexibility
NetSuite is cloud-only. Your data lives in Oracle's data centers. You get automatic upgrades twice a year. You cannot run NetSuite on-premises or in your own cloud environment. For most companies, this is fine. For some — heavily regulated industries, government contractors, companies with strict data residency requirements — it's a dealbreaker.
Acumatica offers genuine deployment flexibility. You can run it in their cloud, in AWS or Azure, or on-premises on your own servers. You can start in the cloud and move on-prem later (or vice versa). The codebase is the same regardless of deployment model.
This matters if: You have data sovereignty requirements, you operate in regions with poor internet connectivity, or your IT team wants infrastructure control. This doesn't matter if: You're a typical mid-market company comfortable with SaaS delivery. Most are.
Manufacturing: Acumatica's strong suit
If manufacturing is central to your business, Acumatica deserves serious consideration. Its manufacturing module is native to the platform and covers production management, material requirements planning (MRP), engineering change management, product configurators, and shop floor control. It was built for discrete and process manufacturing from the ground up.
NetSuite has manufacturing capabilities through its Advanced Manufacturing module, and they've improved significantly over the past few years. Bill of materials, work orders, routing, and basic MRP are all there. But most NetSuite implementation partners will tell you honestly that NetSuite's manufacturing is adequate for light-to-moderate manufacturing but isn't as deep as Acumatica's offering.
For heavy manufacturers — companies where production scheduling, shop floor efficiency, and complex BOMs are the core of daily operations — Acumatica's manufacturing module is meaningfully stronger. For companies where manufacturing is one part of a broader operation (assemble-to-order, light kitting, simple production runs), NetSuite handles it fine.
Where NetSuite pulls ahead
Ecosystem breadth. NetSuite's ecosystem is larger by a wide margin. More implementation partners, more SuiteApp integrations, more pre-built connectors, more third-party tools. If you need a specific integration — say, connecting to a particular 3PL, a niche industry application, or a specialized billing platform — the odds of finding an existing connector are higher with NetSuite.
SuiteCommerce. If you need native eCommerce tied directly to your ERP, NetSuite's SuiteCommerce gives you a storefront that shares your ERP's product catalog, inventory, pricing, and customer data. Acumatica doesn't have a comparable native eCommerce offering. You'd integrate with Shopify, BigCommerce, or another platform.
Financial depth. NetSuite's financial modules — particularly Advanced Revenue Management (ASC 606), multi-book accounting, SuiteBilling for subscription management, and global consolidation — are more mature. For companies with complex financial requirements (multi-subsidiary, multi-currency, complex rev rec), NetSuite has an edge.
CRM. NetSuite includes a built-in CRM that shares the same database as the ERP. It's not Salesforce, but it eliminates the need for a separate CRM integration. Acumatica also has CRM capabilities, but NetSuite's is more commonly used and tighter in its integration with the financial and operational modules.
Where Acumatica pulls ahead
User-friendly interface. Acumatica's UI is more modern and generally easier to navigate than NetSuite's. NetSuite has improved its interface over the years, but Acumatica was built more recently with contemporary UX patterns. Training time for new users tends to be shorter with Acumatica.
Open API and customization. Acumatica is built on an open-architecture platform with RESTful APIs and a .NET-based customization framework. Developers familiar with C# and .NET can extend Acumatica efficiently. NetSuite uses SuiteScript (JavaScript-based), which is capable but operates within a more locked-down environment. Acumatica gives developers more freedom.
Construction and field service. Acumatica has strong vertical solutions for construction and field service management. If you're a contractor, HVAC company, or field service business, Acumatica's industry-specific modules are more mature than what NetSuite offers natively.
Pricing for large user counts. For a company with 100+ users needing system access — especially light users who just need to enter time, check inventory, or approve purchase orders — Acumatica's resource-based pricing can save 30-50% compared to NetSuite's per-user model.
Who should choose what
Choose Acumatica if:
- Manufacturing is your primary operational focus
- You have 75+ users, many of them light-access (warehouse, field, shop floor)
- You need on-premises or hybrid deployment
- You're in construction or field services
- Your budget is tight and you're sensitive to per-user costs
Choose NetSuite if:
- You need strong financials with complex rev rec, multi-entity, or global consolidation
- eCommerce is integrated into your business model
- You want the largest possible ecosystem of integrations and partners
- You're a SaaS, wholesale distribution, or professional services company
- You plan to scale to $50M-500M+ and want a platform with a clear growth path
Either works well for: General mid-market businesses ($10M-100M revenue) with standard operational needs — order management, inventory, financials, basic CRM.
The bottom line
The Acumatica vs NetSuite decision comes down to your business profile. Neither platform is universally better. Acumatica wins on pricing flexibility, manufacturing depth, and deployment options. NetSuite wins on financial sophistication, ecosystem size, and eCommerce capabilities.
Don't choose based on demos alone. Both platforms demo well. Get detailed pricing based on your actual user counts and transaction volumes. Ask for customer references in your specific industry. And make sure you're comparing total cost of ownership — including implementation, customization, and ongoing support — not just license fees.
Frequently Asked Questions
Need help with your NetSuite project?
Whether it's integrations, customization, or support — let's talk about how we can help.

Mercedes Lerena
Co-founder & CEO
Co-founder and CEO of BrokenRubik, leading strategic vision and business operations for over a decade. Expert in building and scaling NetSuite consulting teams, with deep experience in enterprise software delivery and client relationship management.
Get More Insights Like This
Join our newsletter for weekly tips, tutorials, and exclusive content delivered to your inbox.
Related Articles
NetSuite Alternatives: 7 Best ERP Options for 2026
Looking for NetSuite alternatives? Compare top ERP options including SAP Business One, Dynamics 365, Sage Intacct, Acumatica, and more.
NetSuite for SaaS: Why Software Companies Choose It
How SaaS companies use NetSuite for subscription billing, revenue recognition, SaaS metrics, and financial operations. A guide for software companies.
NetSuite for Small Businesses: Is It Worth It?
Honest assessment of NetSuite for small businesses. When it makes sense, when it does not, what it costs, and what alternatives to consider if you are not ready yet.
Mercedes Lerena